While we currently do not have a definitive explanation for how this unique and mysterious image was created from the body of a deceased man, the most plausible current hypothesis comes from a combination of two teams of researchers.ĭr. If this result is obtained, it would indicate that the Shroud of Turin is very likely the burial shroud of Jesus Christ with evidence suggestive of His resurrection in light. When these protocols are observed, it would be surprising if the result was not similar to the results of the four new dating methods mentioned above - approximately A.D. The above scientific evidence requires that a new carbon-dating test be done which observes the standard protocols for sampling. Moreover, the formation of the image by an intense outburst of vacuum ultraviolet radiation is suggestive of a resurrection event similar to that described in the Gospels. The combination of the above evidence is exceedingly difficult to explain in any way other than the burial cloth is that of Jesus of Nazareth. The only known explanation for the formation of the image is an intense burst of vacuum ultraviolet radiation (equivalent to the output of 14,000 excimer lasers) emitted from every three-dimensional point of the body in the Shroud. Formation of the image on the Shroud: The image was not formed by dyes, chemicals, vapors or scorching. Though genetic testing confirms these findings, there is no guarantee that they belong to the man on the Shroud. Some researchers have found that male DNA and an AB blood type are also present on the cloth. They determined that the blood on the Shroud is real. The Shroud has deposits of real human blood, according to the experts who studied the blood flecks gathered on the STURP tapes in 1978. The blood stains on the Shroud: The blood stains tell a story very similar to the highly unusual crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth - they were imprinted on the Shroud before the image was made (the opposite of what would need to be done by a forger). (C) One-hundred twenty coincidences of blood and fluid stains between the Shroud and the Sudarium of Oviedo give evidence of a date and location of the Shroud’s origin similar to that of Jesus. 29 by Pontius Pilate in Judea at the time of Jesus, on his eyelids. (B) Roman coins on the eyes of the image on the Shroud, which give evidence that it’s highly probable that the image of the man on the Shroud of Turin has two Jewish lepta, minted in A.D. Importantly, 13 of the pollen grains are unique to Israel and are found at the bottom of both the Sea of Galilee and the Dead Sea. The remaining grains came from France and Italy. His conclusion was that the majority (45) were from the region of Israel (specifically from sedimentary layers from 2,000 years ago near the area of the Sea of Galilee), with six grains from the eastern Middle East (two grains from Edessa, Turkey, and one growing exclusively in Istanbul/Constantinople). Max Frei who collected dust samples from the Shroud during the 1978 STURP investigation and later classified 58 pollen grains by comparing them to pollen grains in the largest botanical museums around the world. Three kinds of extrinsic dating evidence: (A) Testing of pollen samples by Dr. Raymond Rogers, the two spectroscopic analyses (of professor Giulio Fanti, et al.), and the compressibility and breaking strength tests (of Fanti, et al.) date the Shroud to a time commensurate with the life and crucifixion of Jesus. Four contemporary dating tests: The vanillin dating test of Dr. The 1978 Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP) investigation and subsequent investigations were remarkably thorough, and with the exception of the questionable 1988 carbon dating, all the evidence points to it being the burial cloth of Jesus, including the following: The Shroud has undergone considerably more scientific testing than any other relic in human history. This history is confirmed by the pollen grains found by Max Frei, the coincidences between the Shroud and the Sudarium (facecloth) of Oviedo, and the coincidences between the Shroud’s seven unique facial features and those attributed to the Mandylion - the Holy Image of Edessa. It also has a somewhat sketchy traceable history from Jerusalem to Lirey - through Edessa, Turkey and Constantinople. The cloth has a certifiable history from 1349, when it surfaced in Lirey, France, in the hands of a French nobleman - Geoffrey de Charny.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |